TRADEOFFS IN CANDIDATE SELECTION
(Exhibit 1)
|
SUCCESSION Promotion from Inside |
RECRUITMENT Attraction from Outside |
|
| PROCESS | ||
|
Candidate Identification |
Usually simple. Choice obvious. Process could be too narrow or myopic for desired results. | Not difficult to assemble and compare data using modern research techniques. Decisions on screening may be complex. |
|
Assessment |
Based on analysis of well-known style and accomplishment. Can usually be done with confidence and relative ease. | On the basis of review of compiled data, interviewing, and background inquires. Can be difficult and time consuming. |
|
Attraction |
Usually presents no problem because it involves a simple promotion with possible relocation. | Constitutes the most delicate and demanding task in a creative selection effort. |
|
Integration |
Adjustment of new manager to cultural context is nearly automatic, but adaptation to responsibilities at a higher level can be a problem. | May be difficult to assimilate the new manager into the culture. Performance level should present a lesser problem if the recruitment stressed, is needed for relevant experience. |
| TRADEOFFS |
Promotion from Within |
Attraction from Outside |
|
Risks |
Tend to be greater, but will be spread over future years. | Tend to be more visible and concentrated in the first year or two. |
|
Organizational Impact |
Frequently, there is lower potential for creative innovation, new vigor. | Possible discontinuity. Generally higher organizational anxiety. Possible turbulent transition. |
|
Advantages |
Stability; relatively smooth transition. | Opportunity for healthy change in both form and substance. |
TYPES OF SEARCH ASSIGNMENTS
1. Growth Creates New Position
|
2. Reorganization Creates New Position
|
3. Change Agent
|
4. Replacement of incumbent
|
5. Affirmative Action
|
6. Maintain Status Quo
|
7. Technology Transfer
|
8. Organization Credibility
|
9. Chief Executive of Existing Organization
|
10. Entrepreneurial New Opportunity (CEO or Officer)
|